Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:As a prompt generator for a generative AI called "Midjourney", you will create image prompts for the AI to visualize. I will give you a concept, and you will provide a detailed prompt for Midjourney AI to generate an image. Please adhere to the structure and formatting below, and follow these guidelines: Do not use the words "description" or ":" in any form. Do not place a comma between [ar] and [v]. Write each prompt in one line without using return. Structure: [1] = 海辺の結婚式場 内観 [2] = a detailed description of [1] with specific imagery details. [3] = a detailed description of the scene's environment. [4] = a detailed description of the compositions. [5] = a detailed description of the scene's mood, feelings, and atmosphere. [6] = A style (e.g. photography, painting, illustration, sculpture, artwork, paperwork, 3D, etc.) for [1]. [7] = a detailed description of the scene's mood, feelings, and atmosphere. [ar] = Use "--ar 16:9" for horizontal images, "--ar 9:16" for vertical images, or "--ar 1:1" for square images. [v] = Use "--niji" for Japanese art style, or "--v 5" for other styles. Formatting: Follow this prompt structure: "/imagine prompt: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [ar] [v]". Your task: Create 4 distinct prompts for each concept [1], varying in details description, environment,compositions,atmosphere, and realization. Write your prompts in english. Do not describe unreal concepts as "real" or "photographic". Include one realistic photographic style prompt with lens type and size. Separate different prompts with two new lines. Example Prompts: /imagine prompt: cute dog, fluffy fur, wagging tail, playful expression, sitting on a grassy field, under a clear blue sky, with a colorful collar, in a natural and vibrant setting, by a lake, captured with a Nikon D750 camera, 50mm lens, shallow depth of field, composition focused on the dog's face, capturing its joyful spirit, in a style reminiscent of William Wegman's iconic dog portraits. --ar 1:1 --v 5.2 /imagine prompt: beautiful women in the coffee shop, elegant and sophisticated, sipping a cup of steaming coffee, natural sunlight streaming through the window, soft and warm color tones, vintage decor with cozy armchairs and wooden tables, a bookshelf filled with classic novels, delicate porcelain teacups, a hint of aromatic coffee beans in the air, captured by a Leica M10 camera, 35mm lens, capturing the essence of timeless beauty, composition focused on the woman's face and hands, reminiscent of a painting by Leonardo da Vinci. --ar 1:1 --v 5.2 /imagine prompt: A captivating Halo Reach landscape with a Spartan amidst a battlefield, fallen enemies around, smoke and fire in the background, emphasizing the Spartan's determination and bravery, detailed environment blending chaos and beauty, Illustration, digital art, --ar 16:9 --v 5

answer:/imagine prompt: seaside wedding venue interior, elegant white chairs with delicate lace covers, golden candle holders casting a warm glow, floral centerpieces of blush roses and white peonies, crystal chandeliers reflecting light off the shimmering sea, a grand piano in the corner with sheet music gently fluttering, capturing the essence of romance and sophistication, in a style reminiscent of classical oil paintings. --ar 16:9 --v 5 /imagine prompt: a quaint coastal town wedding venue, overlooking the azure ocean, antique wooden pews adorned with sea shells and starfish, a rustic driftwood arch entwined with fresh blooms, a gentle sea breeze carrying the scent of saltwater and roses, soft pastel sunset hues painting the sky, seagulls circling overhead, capturing the enchanting blend of nature and celebration, in a dreamy watercolor style. --ar 9:16 --v 5 /imagine prompt: beachfront wedding venue interior, modern minimalist decor with sleek white chairs and a cascading floral backdrop, panoramic windows showcasing the crashing waves and golden sand, contemporary geometric light fixtures casting intricate shadows, a sleek marble altar with gilded accents, a sense of serene elegance and luxury, captured with a Canon EOS R6 camera, 24-70mm lens, wide-angle shot focusing on the sweeping ocean view, in a crisp and clean photographic style. --ar 16:9 --v 5.2 /imagine prompt: romantic coastal wedding venue interior, draped in flowing fabrics and fairy lights, vintage wooden benches filled with lush cushions and floral garlands, a magical twilight sky visible through large arched windows, ethereal music floating in the air, a mix of nostalgia and whimsy in the decor, capturing the essence of a fairytale come to life, in an enchanting mixed media illustration style. --ar 9:16 --v 5.

question:Clearly differentiate between confidence interval, HPD interval, confidence bend and coverage probability with examples

answer:Certainly! Let's define and differentiate between these statistical terms: 1. Confidence Interval (CI): A confidence interval is a range of values, derived from sample data, that is likely to contain the value of an unknown population parameter. Confidence intervals are associated with a level of confidence, usually expressed as a percentage (such as 95% or 99%). This percentage reflects the frequency with which the interval, calculated from repeated random sampling, would contain the parameter. However, it does not provide a probability for a specific interval. Example: If we have a sample mean of 100 and the 95% confidence interval for the population mean is (95, 105), it means that if we were to take many random samples from the population and compute a 95% CI for each sample, approximately 95% of those intervals would contain the true population mean. 2. Highest Posterior Density (HPD) Interval: The HPD interval is a concept from Bayesian statistics. It is the interval that contains a given portion of the posterior distribution (e.g., 95%) and where no point inside the interval has a lower probability density than any point outside the interval. The HPD interval is the shortest interval for a given coverage probability. Example: If a Bayesian analysis of a posterior distribution for a parameter θ results in a 95% HPD interval of (50, 60), this means that the interval (50, 60) encompasses 95% of the posterior probability and every point within this range has a higher probability density than points outside the range. 3. Confidence Bend: This term is not standard in statistical terminology. It may be a confusion with confidence band or confidence belt, which refers to a graphical representation displaying the upper and lower confidence intervals across a range of values for an estimated function, such as a regression line. Example: A confidence band around a regression line on a scatter plot illustrates the range within which we can be confident that the true regression line exists for different values of the independent variable. 4. Coverage Probability: Coverage probability is the proportion of times that a statistical procedure will generate intervals that include the true parameter value. It is related to the reliability of the procedure in frequentist terms. The nominal coverage probability is the target level (e.g., 95%), while the actual coverage probability may sometimes differ due to the sample size, distributional assumptions, or method used to construct the intervals. Example: If we construct 95% confidence intervals for the mean from many samples, and the actual proportion of these intervals that include the true population mean is 94%, the coverage probability is 94%. To summarize: - A confidence interval provides a range where we expect the true population parameter to lie with a specified level of confidence. - An HPD interval provides the shortest range that contains a certain amount of the posterior probability and respects the posterior distribution's shape. - A confidence band or bend (if this is what was intended) shows a range of confidence intervals for the predicted values over the scope of an independent variable. - Coverage probability is the actual proportion of times a confidence interval would include the true parameter if the procedure was repeated over many samples.

question:Higher probability density

answer:The term "higher probability density" typically is used in the context of probability density functions (PDFs) in statistics, particularly within Bayesian inference when discussing the Highest Posterior Density (HPD) interval. Probability Density Function (PDF): When dealing with continuous random variables, the probability density function represents the likelihood of a random variable taking on a particular value. For any given point on the x-axis, the value of the PDF at that point represents the relative likelihood of the random variable being near that x value. It is "relative" because, in continuous distributions, the probability of the variable taking on any exact value is technically zero; we consider probabilities over intervals instead. Higher Probability Density: In the context of a PDF, a "higher" probability density means a greater likelihood relative to other values. The peaks of the PDF correspond to areas with higher probability density, indicating that the random variable is more likely to be observed in the vicinity of those values. Within Bayesian statistics, probability density is used to describe the posterior distribution, representing the updated beliefs about a parameter after incorporating prior knowledge and observed data. Highest Posterior Density (HPD) Interval: As mentioned earlier, the HPD interval is a Bayesian interval estimate for a parameter. The HPD interval is the range where the probability density is highest, meaning that it encapsulates the most plausible values of the parameter, given the data. If you were to create a credible interval (analogous to a confidence interval in frequentist statistics) based on a posterior distribution, the HPD would be the narrowest such interval encompassing a given total probability mass (like 95%). For example, imagine you have a posterior distribution for a parameter that is bell-shaped (like a normal distribution). The HPD interval might be the region around the mode (the peak) of the distribution encompassing 95% of the area under the curve. Every point within the HPD interval has a higher probability density than points outside it, which means that parameter values inside this interval are more credible (or more supported by the data) than values outside it. Thus, when we say the HPD interval contains “higher probability density,” we mean that within this range, the observed data and prior information most strongly support the values of the parameter in question.

question:Highest probability distribution

answer:The term "highest probability distribution" is not standard statistical terminology. It might be a misnomer or confusion with other statistical concepts. However, in a Bayesian context or when discussing probability distributions generally, you might be referring to one of a few things: 1. Highest Probability Density (HPD) Interval: As previously explained, an HPD interval is the range of values on the domain of a probability distribution with the highest density such that a given percentage of the distribution lies within this interval. It represents the most credible values for a parameter, given the observed data and prior information. 2. Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE): This is a method for estimating the parameters of a statistical model. The estimated parameters are the ones that maximize the likelihood function, or equivalently, when dealing with probability densities, the ones that make the observed data most probable. 3. Most Probable Value: In a given probability distribution, the most probable value is the mode, which is the value where the probability density or mass function reaches its maximum. If you intended "highest probability distribution" to imply that a certain distribution has higher probability relative to other distributions, it might be necessary to clarify in what context this comparison is made. In Bayesian model comparison, for example, one could argue that a model (with its accompanying distribution) has the highest probability in light of the data by comparing posterior probabilities of models. Without additional context, "highest probability distribution" remains ambiguous. If you have a specific scenario or application in mind, please provide additional details for a more targeted explanation.

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded